Lee v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
328 F.3d 896 · 2003
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably Shaw v. Wilson (2013), Clemons v. Luebbers (2004)
18 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Coleman v. Thompson · Harris v. Reed · Edwards Warden v. Carpenter · Kathleen Braun v. Barbara Powell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Edwards does not tell us whether “the .same claim of ineffective assistance of counsel get[s] reviewed differently when presented merely as cause for a procedural default as opposed to being presented in a petition as the basis in the first instance for habeas relief!.]””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Longworth v. Ozmint“Because the Court of Appeals found no prosecutorial misconduct, it also found that Lee's ... appellate counsel [had not been] ineffective in failing to raise misconduct on Lee's direct appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Pruitt v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.