Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 328 F.3d 941 - Storm v. Storm

Storm v. Storm’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
August 2018
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Markham v. Allen · Farrell v. O'Brien · Iddir v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Dragan v. Miller · Rice v. Rice Foundation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Tortious] interference with inheritance is a recognized tort in Indiana; such an action may be brought in a court of general jurisdiction, provided a will contest is unavailable to supply an adequate remedy.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “phrases his action as one involving tortious interference with his inheritance expectancy, the practical effect of his lawsuit would be similar to that of a successful will contest: the terms of the final, allegedly invalid testamentary instruments would essehtially be bypassed, while [the plaintiff] would receive, as damages, the assets he would have otherwise been entitled to under what he says are [the decedent’s] actual will and trust.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The plaintiffs argue that the probate exception is inapplicable here because this action relates to the execution of an inter vivos trust, not to a will. We reject such a per se rule. The inter vivos trust is clearly a will substitute. However, the fact that this case does involve a will substitute does not automatically render the probate exception applicable.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.