Georgis v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
328 F.3d 962 · 2003
Citation profile
103 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 239 later decisions — most recently October 2020 · most notably Yan Chen v. Gonzales (2005), Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft (2003)
103 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 701 · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Heckler v. Chaney · Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers · Albathani v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 239 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`it makes no practical difference whether the BIA properly or improperly streamlined review of [the Berris'] case' because . . . `our ability to conduct a full and fair appraisal of [the Berris'] case is not compromised.'”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage“we will not automatically yield to the IJ's conclusions when they are drawn from insufficient or incomplete evidence.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage“supported by reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence on the record considered as a whole.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Ememe v. Ashcroft · Lin v. Ashcroft
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.