Aceto v. England’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
16 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 701 (Employment Opportunities for Individuals With Disabilities Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Morgan · Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. · Aka v. Washington Hospital Center
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In other words, [an action is barred for failure to exhaust] if the plaintiff knew, or should have known, about the alleged discriminatory action 45 days prior to”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“that [s]he has been the victim of discrimination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.