Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 328 FSUPP3D 1319 - Daniel v. Navient Solutions, LLC

Daniel v. Navient Solutions, LLC’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
April 2020
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1098G

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc. · Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr · California v. Arc America Corp. · Cliff v. Payco General American Credits, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Uniformity, however, is not one of Congress's expressed goals in enacting the HEA, and broadening the scope of the preemption statute would not rest upon a 'fair understanding of congressional purpose.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “We are unable to confirm that the creation of 'uniformity,' a goal relied upon by the district court in its Preemption Ruling, was actually an important goal of the HEA.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.