Beasley v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 2016
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Hargis · Stephens v. Stephens · 220 Ga. App. 74 - Edwards v. State · 231 Ga. App. 864 - Horne v. State · Stewart v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Beasley filed a brief in support of his motion for new trial on August 16, 2013. In the brief and at the [subsequent] hearing, Beasley argued that he was deprived of a fair trial due to a conflict of interest created by Judge Kirby’s marriage to a member of the district attorney’s office in the same judicial circuit. Beasley’s counsel contended that neither she nor her client was aware of this relationship prior to trial and that both had learned of the conflict only afterward. 8”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Beasley v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.