Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 328 N.C. 313 - State v. Buckom

State v. Buckom’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
4
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

51 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably State v. Vance (1991), 134 N.C. App. 82 - Buckingham v. Buckingham (1999)

51 state decisions

190199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McMichael v. Proctor · Steelman v. City of New Bern · State v. Ingland · Hall v. Post · State v. Massey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Larciny [sic] from the person is either by privately stealing; or by open and violent assault, which is usually called robbery."... At common law, larceny from the person differs from robbery in that larceny from the person lacks the requirement that the victim be put in fear.... Larceny from the person forms a middle ground in the common law between the "private" stealing most commonly associated with larceny, and the taking by force and violence commonly associated with robbery.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “rule because uncontroverted evidence showed that Bradley had died fourteen months after the collision. The Court of Appeals rejected the defendant's contention and held that his trial was free from prejudicial error. On 27 July 1990, this Court allowed the defendant's petition for discretionary review, limited to the issue of the applicability of the year and a day rule. Before addressing the defendant's assignment of error, a review of the history of the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.