Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 328 N.C. 409 - State v. Eason

State v. Eason’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

177
cited by 177 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

177 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 177 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Dogwood Development & Management Co. LLC v. White Oak Transport Co. (2008), State v. Golphin (2000)

177 state decisions

670199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Dunaway v. New York · Hoffman v. United States · United States v. Harris · State v. Vause

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 177 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In order to preserve a question for appellate review, a party must have presented the trial court with a timely request, objection or motion, stating the specific grounds for the ruling sought if the specific grounds are not apparent.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “sufficient to fully satisfy the State's burden of proving each and every element of the offense of murder in the first degree, including premeditation and deliberation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “It is well established that where matters are left to the discretion of the trial court, appellate review is limited to a determination of whether there was a clear abuse of discretion. A trial court may be reversed for abuse of discretion only upon a showing that its actions are manifestly unsupported by reason. A ruling committed to a trial court’s discretion is to be accorded great deference and will be upset only upon a showing that it was so arbitrary that it could not have been the result of a reasoned decision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.