Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 328 N.C. 689 - Lynn v. Overlook Development

Lynn v. Overlook Development’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

98
cited by 98 later decisions
3
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

2 district · 96 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 98 later decisions — most recently December 2025 · most notably Wood v. Guilford County (2002), Isenhour v. Hutto (1999)

2 district · 96 state decisions

4401991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Bumgardner · Hairston v. Alexander Tank & Equipment Co. · Peoples Security Life Insurance v. Hooks · McLean v. McLean · Adams v. Mills

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 98 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “as a matter of law, the allegations of the complaint, treated as true, are sufficient to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under some legal theory.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a cause which in natural and continuous sequence, unbroken by any new and independent cause, produced the plaintiffs injuries, and without which the injuries would, not have occurred, and one from which a person of ordinary prudence could have reasonably foreseen that such a result, or consequences of a generally injurious nature, was probable under all the facts as they existed.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The complaint must be liberally construed, and the court should not dismiss the complaint unless it appears beyond a doubt that the plaintiff could not prove any set of facts to support his claim which would entitle him to relief.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.