State v. Chadwick’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently June 2001 · most notably Nassar v. Sissel (1986), State v. Ware (1983)
4 federal appellate · 25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Roberts v. Louisiana · Williams v. United States · United States v. Harris · United States v. Lamb · State v. Mark
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he test for admission of such evidence is two-fold: (1) the evidence must be relevant and (2) if the evidence is relevant the trial court must determine whether the probative value of the exhibits outweighs the prejudice which would be caused by their admission into evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Oliver“Mere exposure to news accounts does not prove a substantial likelihood of prejudice. (Citation omitted). Voir dire of prospective jurors should be trusted to expose any substantial prejudices among the jurors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ware
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.