Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 328 P.3d 77 - Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

23 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · North Carolina v. Pearce · Johnson v. United States · Benton v. Maryland · Bousley v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The proper extent of appellate review for an unpreserved claim of constitutional error is a question of law that we review de novo.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “exceptional situation where reversal is necessary to preserve the integrity of the judicial process or to prevent a miscarriage of justice.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “defendant must raise an objection in the trial court in order to preserve that argument for appeal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.