Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 328 Pa. Super. 104 - Commonwealth v. O'Shea

328 Pa. Super. 104 - Commonwealth v. O'Shea’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 2014
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 2014

8 state decisions

401984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Mapp v. Ohio · Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · United States v. Ventresca

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(B) No search warrant shall issue but upon probable cause supported by one or more affidavits sworn to before the issuing authority.... The issuing authority, in determining whether probable cause has been established, may not consider any evidence outside the affidavits. (D) At any hearing on a motion for the...suppression of evidence, or for suppression of the fruits of evidence, obtained pursuant to a search warrant, no evidence shall be admissible to establish probable cause other than the affidavits provided for in paragraph (B).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Probable cause to issue a search warrant has been defined as those facts reasonably necessary to show (1) that the items sought are connected with criminal activity, and (2) that the items will be found in the place to be searched.” O’Shea at 111 , 476 A.2d at 915 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.