Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 328 SO2D 417 - Protheroe v. Protheroe

Protheroe v. Protheroe’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 1994
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chastain v. Chastain · 291 So. 2d 620 - Gamse v. Gamse · 273 So. 2d 780 - Valle v. State · Protheroe v. Protheroe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The Opinion of the District Court of Appeal is quashed to the extent that it affirms modification of an alimony award without a showing of changed circumstances. * * * ” (Protheroe v. Protheroe, Sup.Ct.Fla.1976, 328 So.2d 417 , Opinion filed March 3, 1976)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.