Meyer v. Meyer

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 9, 1976

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1976-03-09

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1987

1 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“a presumption of correctness, and appellant's burden is to show that the judgment was clearly erroneous.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 515 So. 2d 1298 - Gustafson v. Jensen

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1976-03-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1This is an appeal by the wife and a cross-appeal by the husband from portions of a final judgment of dissolution of marriage relating to the court’s adjudication of certain property rights between the parties to the action.

¶2The grounds relied upon for reversal have been carefully considered in the light of the record and briefs and we have found no reversible error has been shown. The decision of the chancellor comes to us with a presumption of correctness, and appellant’s burden is to show that the judgment was clearly erroneous.

¶3Affirmed.