Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

328 S.W.2d 295

Chase v. State

Decided October 28, 1959

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1964

2 state decisions

Relies on Lawhorn v. State · Hebert v. State · 160 Tex. Crim. 37 - Dunn v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1959-10-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

DAVIDSON, Judge.

¶1This is an appeal in a bail bond forfeiture case.

¶2There is nothing in the record showing that a brief has been filed in this court, as required by the Rules of Civil Procedure. Art. 866, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.

¶3Failure to comply with the rules requiring the filing of briefs authorizes a dismissal of the appeal for the want of prosecution. Hebert v. State, 158 Tex.Cr.R. 271, 255 S.W.2d 201; Dunn v. State, 160 Tex.Cr.R. 37, 267 S.W.2d 144; Bell v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 244 S.W.2d 210.

¶4Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

/328/sw2d/295 · .json · Public domain