Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 328 SW2D 462 - Bichsel v. Heard

Bichsel v. Heard’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2009
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 2009

6 state decisions

30195919601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Alpha Petroleum Co. v. Terrell · Alpha Petroleum Co. v. Terrell · Hill v. Brown · Salvage Process Corp. v. Acme Tank Cleaning Process Corp. · Dignowity v. Fly

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “effect of instantly dissolving the injunction, although the appellee had a right to file a motion for rehearing and, if this were overruled, then to apply for a writ of error to the Supreme Court of Texas.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “If we had desired, we could have so worded our judgment, or added a saving clause thereto, which would have prevented it from becoming instantly effective.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.