Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 328 SW3D 566 - Steadman v. State

Steadman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 2012
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 350th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Waller v. Georgia · Press-Enterprise Company v. Superior Court of California Riverside County · Jenkins v. Anderson · Wesbrook v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We hold that the trial court’s findings are sufficient to meet the Waller test. The one seeking to close the hearing was the trial court. In its findings, the trial court advanced an overriding interest that was likely to be prejudiced: security. The trial court did not make the closure any broader than necessary to protect that overriding interest; only a few family members were excluded, and that exclusion was only for the voir dire portion of the trial. The findings of the trial court also show that it considered other reasonable alternatives to closing the proceeding. The trial court explored the use of other courtrooms and other facilities in the courthouse and found each of those alternatives to be lacking as well. We hold that the trial court’s findings adequately support the closure under Waller." 7”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.