In Re Silvus’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 11 U.S.C. § 1112 · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 326 · 11 U.S.C. § 329 · 11 U.S.C. § 330 · 11 U.S.C. § 348
Relies on United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Caminetti v. United States · Norwest Bank Worthington v. Ahlers · Pegram v. Herdrich · Barnhart v. Sigmon Coal Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(C) whether the services were necessary to the administration of, or beneficial at the time at which the service was rendered toward the completion of, a case under this title.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Pivinski · In Re Kuhn“25 percent on the first $5,000 or less, 10 percent on any amount in excess of $5,000 but not in excess of $50,000, 5 percent on any amount in excess of $50,000 but not in excess of $1,000,000, and reasonable compensation not to exceed 3 percent of such moneys in excess of $1,000,000, upon all moneys disbursed or turned over in the case by the trustee to parties in interest, excluding the debt- or, but including holders of secured claims.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Pivinski“[T]he language of Section 326(a) is clear and unambiguous: that reasonable compensation to a Chapter 7 Trustee is to be computed based “upon all moneys disbursed or turned over in the case by the trustee to parties in interest, excluding the debtor, but including holders of secured claims.” ... Thus, without any disbursements or money turned over to any parties in interest, there can be no calculation of compensation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Pivinski
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.