In Re Hellen’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 341 · 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 26 U.S.C. § 213 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Kontrick v. Ryan · Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz · 204 Ill. 2d 159 - People v. Donoho · In re D.L. · Bankr L Rep P 70653 in the Matter of Richard E Barker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“stated that [the husband] was tested, fitted for, and had purchased a custom-made bicycle that afforded him the type of exercise recommended by the physician.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Dowell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.