Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 329 BR 848 - In Re Thum

In Re Thum’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
February 2021
most recently cited

2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 2021

2 state decisions

60200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 522

Relies on Segal v. Rochelle · Kokoszka v. Belford · White v. Stump · 103 Ill. 2d 266 - In Re Marriage of Logston · 29 114 75276 Yonikus Yonikus

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “do not give rise to a general exemption for wages earned but not yet paid to an employee and have no relevance to the exemptions that a debtor may claim in a bankruptcy case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[o]nce he deposits the wages into a bank account ... the funds become fair game for creditors.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.