Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 329 F.2d 180 - United States v. Goss

United States v. Goss’s Empirical Analysis

329 F.2d 180 · 1964

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably United States v. Varelli (1969), United States v. Perez (1973)

21 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

90196419701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 26 U.S.C. § 7206

Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Berger v. United States · Blumenthal v. United States · Moses Lake Homes, Inc. v. Grant County · Ingram v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “so far apart and so differently peopled as to destroy any semblance of relationship.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “an election by the Government of the conspiracy it would prosecute,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.