Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 329 F.2d 410 - United States v. Eisner

United States v. Eisner’s Empirical Analysis

329 F.2d 410 · 1964

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
February 2009
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently February 2009

13 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

7019641970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sweet v. United States · Kahm v. United States · Byrnes v. Walker, Warden · United States v. Eisner · Schmidt v. Esquire, Inc. Schmidt v. Reader's Digest Ass'n, Inc. Schmidt v. Crowell-Collier Pub. Co

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A court of record speaks only through its records.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.