Seeber v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
329 F.2d 571 · 1964
Citation profile
30 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently September 2004 · most notably United States v. Twine (1988), United States v. Campagnuolo (1979)
30 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 875 · 47 U.S.C. § 605
Relies on McNabb v. United States · Fiswick v. United States · Goldman v. United States · Crooker v. State of California · Rathbun v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If there had been no ■ other proof on the subject, save the testimony of the operators, then the slips, without any collateral proof tending to link defendant with the calls, lacked authenticity and should not have been admitted.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.