Green v. Bomar’s Empirical Analysis
329 F.2d 796 · 1964
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Goldsby v. United States · Maloy v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of West Palm Beach · Dorsey v. Gill · Dorsey v. Gill · Moore v. Aderhold
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * The district judge held that no federal constitutional right of appellant was violated in not giving him a preliminary hearing before a magistrate. We agree. “Assuming the appellant was not given a preliminary hearing, his constitutional rights were not violated. This, does not constitute a denial of due process of law. A criminal case may be taken directly before the grand jury and an indictment returned by that body on testimony of witnesses. * * ””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.