Vang v. Nevada’s Empirical Analysis
329 F.3d 1069 · 2003
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 57 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2022 · most notably Day v. McDonough (2006), Robinson v. Ignacio (2004)
31 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Coleman v. Thompson · Todd Hiivala v. Tana Wood · Futuresource, LLC v. Reuters Ltd. · Taunt v. General Retirement System of Detroit · Koerner v. Grigas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“applies to bar federal habeas review when the state court has declined to address the petitioner's federal claims because he failed to meet state procedural requirements.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.