Parker v. Bounds’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 district · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently June 2009 · most notably 26 Ariz. App. 444 - State v. Fuentes (1976), Ham v. North Carolina (1973)
8 federal appellate · 1 district · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Griffin v. People of the State of Illinois · Douglas v. People of State of California · Boddie v. Connecticut · Tate v. Short
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We think it is clear that this basic constitutional guarantee is violated when punishment already exacted for an offense is not fully ‘credited’ in imposing sentence upon a new conviction for the same offense. The constitutional violation is flagrantly apparent in a case involving the imposition of a maximum sentence after reconviction. “Suppose for example, in a jurisdiction where the maximum allowable sentence for larceny is 10 years’ imprisonment, a man succeeds in getting his larcency conviction set aside after serving 3 years in prison. If, upon reconviction, he is given a 10-year sentence, then, quite clearly, he will have received multiple punishments for the same offense. For he will have been compelled to serve separate prison terms of 3 years and 10 years, although the maximum single punishment for that offense is 10 years’ imprisonment. % >}c % * * * “We hold that the constitutional guarantee against multiple punishments for the same offense absolutely requires that punishments already exacted must be fully ‘credited’ in imposing sentence upon a new conviction for the same offense.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(P)retrial detention is nothing less than punishment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Durkin v. Davis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.