Bradley v. Ramsey’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Pembaur v. City of Cincinnati · Owen v. City of Independence
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“key difference being that on a 12(c) motion, the court is to consider the answer as well as the complaint.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a] defendant acts with malice when he wantonly does that which a man of reasonable intelligence would know to be contrary to his duty and which he intends to be prejudicial or injurious to another.” Grad v. Kaasa, 312 N.C. 310, 313 , 321 S.E.2d 888, 890 (1984). 45 . Elsewhere, Plaintiffs allege a conspiracy involving Wray, Brady, Sanders,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.