Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 329 FSUPP2D 949 - Directv, Inc. v. Thomas

Directv, Inc. v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
February 2005
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2511 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2512 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2520 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 47 U.S.C. § 605

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Dyniewicz v. United States · Coalition for Government Procurement v. Federal Prison Industries, Inc. · Newcomb v. Ingle · Lanier v. Bryant

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... Direetv’s evidence shows that it was not aware of [the defendants’ purchases] until September 14, 2001, when [the seized company] turned over ... [additional] records implicating Thomas and Suggs.... ****** ... the records seized on May 25, 2001, [during the raid] did not provide Directv with any indication that the specific violations at issue had occurred. Therefore, ... the date of the ... [seized company] raid did not initiate the running of the limitations period ... because they are not the dates on which Directv first had a reasonable opportunity to discovery the respective violations of the Wiretap Act that are the subject matter of these two lawsuits.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A civil action under this section may not be commenced later than two years after the date upon which the claimant first has a reasonable opportunity to discover the violation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.