Thomas v. Haslam’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
1 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1746 · 28 U.S.C. § 1963 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“faced with the need to navigate the world and no feasible, affordable, and legal option for doing so”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. People v. Dueñas“legitimate interest in building inescapable debt traps”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. People v. Dueñas
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.