Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 329 ILLAPP 28 - Coulson v. Discerns

Coulson v. Discerns’s Empirical Analysis

1946

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
March 2008
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently March 2008

6 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

701946195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ohio Building Safety Vault Co. v. Industrial Board · Beckett v. F. W. Woolworth Co. · Casey v. Chicago Railways Co. · 296 Ill. App. 469 - Roberts v. City of Rockford · 224 Ill. App. 613 - O'Connor v. Aluminum Ore Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It cannot be said that the existence of a certain fact may reasonably be inferred from the evidence when the existence of another fact inconsistent with the first can be from the same evidence inferred with equal certainty. A theory cannot be said to be established by circumstantial evidence unless the facts relied on are of such a nature and are so related to each other that it is the only conclusion that can reasonably be drawn from them. (Citing cases.) But the proof of such facts may be made by circumstantial as well as by direct evidence. A greater or less probability leading, on the whole, to a satisfactory conclusion, is all that can reasonably be required to establish controverted facts.” (Citing cases.) 4”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““A fact cannot be established by circumstantial evidence unless the circumstances are of a nature and so related to each other that it is the only conclusion that can be drawn therefrom, and mere conjecture, guess or suspicion is insufficient.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.