¶1Decree affirmed. The defendants’ brief describes this case as a bill in equity by members of one church against the officers of another church for a determination of title to certain real estate. After hearing a final decree was entered dismissing the bill. The plaintiffs appealed. The evidence is not reported. There is no finding of material facts. The only question now open is whether as matter of law the decree dismissing the bill would be permissible on the pleadings. Dondis v. Lash, 283 Mass. 353, 354. It is obvious that such a decree could be entered on the pleadings.
329 Mass. 764
Davis v. Hill
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided October 9, 1952
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · decided 1952-10-09
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently January 1966
3 state decisions
Relies on Dondis v. Lash
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1952-10-09
View the full empirical analysis of this case →