¶1For reasons stated by Judge Diana G. Motz for the Court of Special Appeals in CAM Construction v. Beccio, 92 Md.App. 452, 608 A.2d 1264 (1992), the judgment is affirmed.
¶2JUDGMENT AFFIRMED, WITH COSTS.
329 Md. 600
Beccio v. Cam Construction Co.
Decided March 12, 1993
Court of Appeals of Maryland · decided 1993-03-12
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 2008
8 state decisions
Relies on 92 Md. App. 452 - CAM Construction Co., Inc. v. Beccio
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1993-03-12
View the full empirical analysis of this case →