Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 329 Mo. 254 - State v. Hannebrink

State v. Hannebrink’s Empirical Analysis

1931

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
February 1968
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 1968

10 state decisions

601931194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hoskins v. Hoskins · Green River Light & Water Co. v. Beeler · Holland Banking Co. v. Continental National Bank · State v. Harris · State v. Mertens

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““No assignment of error, or joinder in error, shall be necessary upon any appeal or writ of error, in a criminal case, issued or taken pursuant to the foregoing provisions of this article; but the court shall proceed upon the return thereof without delay, and render judgment upon the record before them. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.