State v. Brogden’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
51 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably State v. Daniels (1994), State v. Robinson (1991)
51 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Mills v. Maryland · McKoy v. North Carolina · State v. Earnhardt · Brown v. North Carolina
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although the United States Supreme Court has stated that the confrontation clause of the federal constitution guarantees each criminal defendant the fundamental right to personal presence at all critical stages of the trial,... our state constitutional right of confrontation has been interpreted as being broader in scope, guaranteeing the right of every accused to be present at every stage of his trial.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Williams · State v. Exum“defendant, in failing to elicit from the jurors by means of questioning or other proper evidence the race of each juror , has failed to carry his burden of establishing an adequate record for appellate review.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“If a defendant in cases such as this believes a prospective juror to be of a particular race, he can bring this fact to the trial court's attention and ensure that it is made a part of the record . Further, if there is any question as to the prospective juror's race , this issue should be resolved by the trial court based upon questioning of the juror or other proper evidence [.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.