329 N.J. Super. 220 - State v. Rolex’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[T]he parties, including the Attorney General, should address the question whether it is feasible to devise more specific guidelines than are set forth in Directive No. 1 to identify those cases in which it is appropriate to include a no appearance/no waiver provision in a plea offer. -The parties also should consider whether, assuming no appearance/no waiver plea agreements remain valid after Brimage , there is a need for statewide guidelines concerning the prosecutor’s invocation of the no waiver provision following a defendant’s failure to appear, and if so, whether those guidelines should provide that, under some circumstances, a defendant’s failure to appear may result in a sentence which includes a period of pai’ole ineligibility that is longer than the period provided in the plea agreement, but shorter than the full three years mandated by N.J.S.A 2C:35-7. [Ibid.]”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Rolex