State v. Stufflebean’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
44 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently December 2015 · most notably Alholm v. Wilt (1986), State v. Ford (1995)
44 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Caron · State v. Wahlberg · State v. West · State v. Perry · State v. White
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In an appeal based on juror bias, an appellant must show that the challenged juror was subject to challenge for cause, that actual prejudice resulted from the failure to dismiss, and that appropriate objection was made by appellant.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Blais · State v. Larson“[^Inconsistencies and conflicts in some particular area between one state witness and another do not constitute false testimony nor any basis for reversal. ‘They are a sign of the fallibility of human perception — not proof that false testimony was given at trial.’”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Smith“Upon prosecution for a crime, the actor may be convicted of either the crime charged or an included offense, but not both.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bobo
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.