Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 329 P.2d 676 - Meyer v. Moore

Meyer v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
6
states following
November 1995
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently November 1995

15 state decisions

5019581960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on City of Okmulgee v. Hemphill · City of Altus v. Wise · Norman v. Scrivner-Stevens Co. · Yellow Transit Freight Lines, Inc. v. Allred · Wilson v. Shawnee Milling Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where competent evidence is introduced on the question of negligence from which reasonable men might draw different conclusions, it is one for the jury, and under like circumstances the question of proximate cause is one for the jury. * * * “In order for an intervening cause to relieve one guilty of primary negligence from liability such intervening cause must have been the direct, sufficient and proximate cause of the injury and must entirely supersede the original act of negligence. If such intervening cause might reasonably have been foreseen as the natural and probable consequence of the condition created by the primary negligence the original wrongdoer will not be relieved from liability.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"2. The proximate cause of any injury must be the efficient cause which sets in motion the chain of circumstances leading to the injury; if the negligence complained of merely furnishes a condition by which the injury was possible and a subsequent independent act caused the injury, the existence of such condition is not the proximate cause of the injury."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a bailment for hire under which it was the duty of the defendants to use ordinary care in safeguarding the plaintiffs' airplane during the time it was stored at the airport,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.