Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

329 S.C. 309

In re Brown

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 18, 1997

Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 1997-12-18

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently November 1999

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-12-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

¶2Disciplinary Counsel has filed a petition asking this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(b), RJDE, Rule 502, SCACR, for willfully violating an order of this Court. Respondent opposes the relief sought in the petition.

¶3We hereby place respondent on interim suspension from his duties as a probate judge until further order of this Court. We also find that respondent’s conduct warrants an interim suspension from the practice of law pursuant to Rule 17(b), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. Respondent’s license to practice law in this State is therefore suspended until further order of this Court.

¶4IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Ernest A. Finney, Jr., C.J./s/ Jean H. Toa!, A.J./s/ James E. Moore, A.J./s/ John H. Waller, Jr., A.J./s/ E.C. Burnett, III, A.J.
/329/sc/309 · .json · Public domain