Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 329 SO2D 287 - Darden v. State

Darden v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
December 2020
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2020 · most notably Darden v. Wainwright (1986), Dugger v. Adams (1989)

2 federal appellate · 42 state decisions

330197619801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Ethridge v. United States · 204 So. 2d 515 - State v. Jones · 112 So. 2d 380 - In re Florida Appellate Rules · Tyson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “reasonably evident that the remarks might have influenced the jury to reach a more severe verdict of guilt than it would have otherwise done.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`the rule against inflammatory and abusive argument by a state's attorney is clear, each case must be considered upon its own merits and within the circumstances pertaining when the questionable statements were made.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]here was overwhelming eyewitness and circumstantial evidence to support a finding of guilt on all charges and a recommendation of a death sentence for first degree murder.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.