State v. Bomar’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““At this point it is proper and necessary for an orderly disposition of this appeal to state that the purported bill of exceptions can not be considered by this Court. It was not filed within the 30 days provided by T.C.A. sec. 27-111, nor was an extension of said period applied for or obtained. Suggs v. State, 195 Tenn. 170 , 258 S.W.2d 747 . The order in the final decree allowing 45 days for perfecting the appeal, as permitted by T.C.A. sec. 27-312, does not aid the situation because said Code provision does not have any application to the time for filing a bill of exceptions. Strain v. Roddy, 171 Tenn. 181 , 101 S.W.2d 475 ; Beiler v. State, 158 Tenn. 404 , 14 S.W.2d 51 .””

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Chattanooga Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Disbrow · Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Tennessee v. Eddins