McQueen v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2012
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Hernandez v. New York · Purkett v. Elem · Boykin v. State · Brooks v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It would be an unreasonable interpretation of the statute to require the State to prove the driver of the other vehicle complied with "countless" vehicle-related regulations, many of which have little or nothing to do with whether the driver of the other vehicle bore responsibility for the collision due to his own negligence or vehicle operation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“An operator ... shall control the speed of the vehicle as necessary to avoid colliding with another person or vehicle that is on or entering the highway in compliance with law and the duty of each person to use due care.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he State should have negated the possible violations of these and countless other laws that the complaining witness may not have been in compliance with at the time.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.