Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

33 Ala. 428

Redman v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1859

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1859-01-15

Tried before the Hon. Robert Dougherty. The indictment in this case charged, “ that R. A. Red-man and John Hicks did unlawfully engage in a horse-race along a public road in said county.” After conviction, the defendant Redman moved in arrest of judgment, on the ground that, “ although the statute makes horse-racing along a public road a misdemeanor, it fails to provide any punishment therefor; and as it is a purely statutory offense, the statute alone can be looked to for…

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1916

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1859-01-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

A. J. WALKER, C. J.—

¶1Section 1180 of the Code declares it to be a misdemeanor for any person to engage in any horse-race along or across any public road; and section 3074 expressly prescribes, that misdemeanors are, unless some other express provision is made by law, indictable offenses. The Code does not prescribe any punishment for the offense of horse-racing along or across the public road; and it is argued, that because no punishment is annexed to the offense, none ean be inflicted upon the accused. We do not so understand the law. The authorities fully sustain the proposition, that where the statute prohibits an act, and declares it a misdemeanor, the offense is indictable, and punishable asa common-law misdemeanor.—Code, § 3301; 1 Bishop on Cr. L. § 349; 1 Archbold, 2.

¶2The judgment of the court below is affirmed.

/33/ala/428 · .json · Public domain