33 Ala. App. 148 - Mann v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1947
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 20 Ala. App. 578 - Cline v. State · 19 Ala. App. 583 - Sandlin v. State · 28 Ala. App. 97 - McCleskey v. State · 23 Ala. App. 457 - Sharp v. State · 33 Ala. App. 115 - Mann v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The court did not err in overruling appellant’s challenge for cause directed toward certain jurors who had been in the court room and heard the testimony in cases similar to the case against this appellant. Such situation is not a ground for challenge, and the ruling of the trial judge, in the absence of gross abuse, which is not here evident, will not be disturbed. Sandlin v. State, 19 Ala.App. 583 , 99 So. 784 ; Cline v. State, 20 Ala.App. 578 , 104 So. 347 ; Sharp v. State, 23 Ala.App. 457 , 126 So. 895 ; Davis v. State, 24 Ala.App. 190 , 132 So. 458 ; McCleskey v. State, 28 Ala.App. 97 , 179 So. 394 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gaskin v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.