33 Ala. App. 221 - Gooch v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1947
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 1976
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Rembert v. State · Deal v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. · Hobbs v. State · Taylor v. City of Clanton · Jones v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““1. Does a check dated on Sunday possess sufficient legal efficacy to defraud so as to be the subject of forgery where no extrinsic facts are alleged in the indictment? “2. Does Title 9, Section 21, Code of Alabama 1940, prevent the prosecution in the name of the State for the forgery of an instrument dated on Sunday?””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Williams v. State“Therefore an indictment in charging forgery should show that the instrument (check) was one the forgery of which would be an offense under the law. And if the writing is such `”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Williams v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.