Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 33 Ala. App. 301 - Snellings v. Jones

33 Ala. App. 301 - Snellings v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

1947

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
November 1964
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 1964 · most notably National Association for Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama M Flowers (1964), 35 Ala. App. 409 - Arrick v. Fanning (1950)

36 state decisions

260194719501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Suell v. Derricott · Kinnon v. L. & N. R. R. · Hall v. Pearce · 29 Ala. App. 411 - William E. Harden, Inc. v. Harden · Life Casualty Ins. Co. of Tennessee v. Womack

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In the hurry of perfecting an appeal it is the usual practice of lawyers to assign as error all matters that might be even faintly meritorious. Upon further study while preparing his brief he may conclude that, in his anxiety to fully cover all possible errors in his assignments, he has included some that are untenable. These he is free to abandon simply by not carrying them forward in his brief and argument, for as a corollary to the rule that errors not assigned will not be considered on appeal is the proposition that assignments not specified in the brief are considered as abandoned.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.