33 Ala. App. 328 - Scott v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1948
Citation profile
35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently August 2015 · most notably 44 Ala. App. 303 - Aldio v. State (1967), Russell v. State (1948)
35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on First Nat. Bank of Montgomery v. Montgomery Cotton Mfg. Co. · Deal v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. · 28 Ala. App. 587 - State of Tennessee v. Hamilton · Tarrant American Savings Bank v. Smokeless Fuel Co. · Williams v. Lowe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as authorizing the extradition of any person in this state to any other state where the extradition proceedings, directly or indirectly, seek to aid in the collection of any debt, demand or claim against the party sought to be extradited.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Busey v. State · Chatham v. State““The language of Section 68, Title 15, of: the Code of Alabama of 1940, is clear and explicit. It was passed to preserve and protect the real purpose of rendition statutes, and; to protect the process from the evils and; private uses to which it was exposed. • The legislative intent is clear from the language of the statute. There is no word in it of doubtful import. It is broad in its application, and emphatic in its prohibition. The following underlined words of the statute are all inclusive. They clearly reveal that the Legislature meant this prohibition to have a broad application, to be liberally construed.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Chatham v. State““Where the governor’s warrant recited that accused was charged in Georgia with ‘the crime of Misdemeanor (bad check),’ and the undisputed evidence disclosed that check was returned with the notation ‘Drawn against uncollectible funds,’ and that payee has instituted civil or equitable proceedings, which are pending, and has threatened accused with arrest and extradition if money was not promptly paid, and that extradition proceedings were instituted, directly or indirectly, to aid in the collection of such a check, extradition could not be had. ...””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Busey v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.