Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 33 Ala. App. 364 - Hayes v. State

33 Ala. App. 364 - Hayes v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
October 1986
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently October 1986 · most notably 519 So. 2d 565 - Musgrove v. State (1986), 50 Ala. App. 206 - Acoff v. State (1973)

29 state decisions

11019481950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. State · Cross v. State · George v. State · Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. Drennen · Vernon v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The solicitor objected to this question which was propounded to a witness for the defendant: ‘Did George make any attempt to flee or get out of the presence of Mr. H. A. Bradford or Mr. Henri Bradford from the time he left the scene of the shooting until he got to Linden?’ There was no effort made by the prosecution to show that the accused attempted to evade arrest. In this state of the testimony the defendant could not show that he did not try to flee. Vaughn v. State, 130 Ala. 18 , 30 So. 669 ; Starke v. State, 31 Ala.App. 322 , 16 So.2d 426 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It is not disputed in the evidence that the defendant shot Mr. Bradford five times with a pistol. * * * [I]n view of the undisputed evidence in the case, we cannot see how the introduction of this pistol could have in any way harmed the appellant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.