Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 33 Ala. App. 377 - Ex Parte Hennies

33 Ala. App. 377 - Ex Parte Hennies’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
3
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably Ong Hing v. Thurston (1966), 447 So. 2d 713 - Ex Parte City of Tuskegee (1984)

32 state decisions

10019481950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex Parte Bankhead · Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Town of Boaz · City of Decatur v. Brock · Town of Camden v. Bloch · Max J. Winkler Brokerage Co. v. Courson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"`A direct contempt consists of disorderly or insolent behavior committed during the session of the court, and in its immediate view and presence, such as the unlawful and willful refusal of any person to be sworn as a witness, or the refusal to answer any legal or proper question, or the giving of false testimony, or any breach of the peace, noise or disturbance so near to the court as to interrupt its proceedings. An indirect contempt, sometimes called a `constructive contempt', may consist of willful disobedience of any process or order lawfully issued or made by the court and resistance willfully offered by any person to the execution of a lawful order or process of the court.'" (Emphasis in original).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Certiorari at common law was an original writ issued out of a superior, to an inferior court, to bring up the record and determine, from an inspection thereof, whether the judgment of the inferior court was erroneous or without authority.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.