Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 33 ARK 150 - Ferguson v. Peden

Ferguson v. Peden’s Empirical Analysis

1878

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
October 1968
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1968

9 state decisions

201878188018901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “So long as a man is in possession of land, claiming title, however wrongfully, and with whatever degree of knowledge that he has. no right, so long the real owner is out of possession, in a constructive as well as an actual sense. It is of the nature of the statute of limitation, when applied to civil, actions, in effect, to mature a wrong into a right, by cutting off the remedy. To warrant its application in ejectment, the books require color of title, by deed or other documental semblance of right in the defendant, only when the defense is founded on a constructive adverse possession. But neither a deed nor any equivalent muniment is necessary, where the possession is indicated by actual occupation, and any other evidence of an adverse claim exists. The muniment is but one circumstance by which to make out hn adverse possession.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.