Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 33 Backes 186 - Mathis v. Holmes

Mathis v. Holmes’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
July 1998
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently July 1998

4 state decisions

10194319501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Whitecar v. Michenor · 101 N.J. Eq. 145 - Grupe v. Rudisill · Everett v. Trustees of the First Presbyterian Church · Morgan v. Rose · Skinner v. Holmes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is indeed lamentable when those united in their devotion to God, discordantly attempt to sever their accustomed unity in the pursuit of religious worship.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.